Let us think upon the counterpoint paragraph: the point of the counterpoint paragraph is to address/acknowledge the other side of the argument and then to REFUTE (to prove wrong) the other side with your own argument. Some points to consider:
- You do not need to add direct quotes to this paragraph as you are NOT proving the other side's argument. Do not make a brand new argument that confuses the reader.
- As you are using your argument to prove the other side wrong, please make the effort to rephrase the argument and make it fresh--no one wants to re-read what was just written verbatim.
- You really do not need more than two points when addressing the other side of the argument.
- Make sure you transition into the counterpoint paragraph from your last body paragraph:
- ...However, some might question the results of the evidence presented in that other explanations exist to back-up Queenie's story...
Here is a claim statement for "Slip or Trip?":
The evidence clearly shows Queenie is lying about Arthur falling to his death in that he has an unlikely post-death grip of a drinking glass, his clothing is remarkably unrumpled, and his surrounding environment is in perfect order.
Now a different perspective set as a claim for counterpoint paragraph:
Arthur could have simply passed out just as he was heading down the stairs which would explain, among other things, Queenie's hysteria and Arthur's relaxed posture as he lays at the bottom of the stairs.
As if. Now, comes the job of the writer to refute the opposing claim with his/her argument of what the evidence really shows.
Now, if such were the case, that Arthur passed out as he began to descend the stairs, he would not still be holding onto a glass as his grip would have relaxed due to his unconsciously state. The hand does not involuntarily grasp objects when one is unconscious as grasping is a voluntary movement (Ha! note my warrant, which validates MY argument, not the other side's.). Also, even if it was remotely possible that he held onto the glass as he fell, which it is not, landing on the floor would have knocked the glass out of his hand. As to Arthur's posture, due to his supposed unconsciousness, his body certainly would not have been in a relaxed position as it ended its fall. Arthur would have gained momentum as he fell, because he would not be able to try and stop himself in any way, with the end result being a contorted, grotesque positioning of his body at the bottom of the stairs. Clearly, Arthur did not fall down the stairs--the evidence shows that he was actually heading up the stairs! Everything about his body and his surrounding environment indicates a fall DOWN the stairs is out of the question, but falling backwards as he headed up the stairs, due to being whacked on the back of the head, is completely feasible.
As a little helpful hint, I offer the beginning of the conclusion paragraph:
Thus, one must question if Queenie hysterical because Arthur is dead. The reality is that Queenie is hysterical because she killed Arthur and is trying to cover her doings in order to avoid dealing with the consequences of COLD BLOODED MURDER!
Good luck! I will see you on Thursday.


